PHI107
CHA104Q4 6.5
ATL57
NO74Q3 7:09
PIT3
MTL410:40 - 2ND
TOR3
VAN15:46 - 2ND
OKST21
ISU21Q2 2:00
MIA7
UNC7Q2 8:42
OSU6
USC17Q2 9:36
MSST0
TEX7Q2 7:40
MIZ10
ARK0Q2 15:00
SAC13
MEM23Q1 1:56
CLE23
MIL22Q1 28.5
MIN22
SA31Q1 35.6
CBJ0
DAL16:48 - 1ST
ATL12
GS14Q1 0.0
OKC
HOU8:30P
CHI
COL9:30P
CGY
COL10:00P
TXST
BOIS10:00P
ND
VILL9:30ANDVILL12:00P
BAL
BUF1:00P
TEN
CIN1:00P
ARI
DAL1:00P
MIN
DET1:00P
LV
NYJ1:00P
CLE
PIT1:00P
ATL
TB1:00P
IND
JAX1:00P
LAC
LAR4:05P
KC
DEN4:25P
NE
MIA4:25P
BOS
LA5:00P
SD
BAY5:00P
UTA
GFC5:00P
POR
HOU5:00P
DEN
NC5:00P
KC
LOU5:00P
ORL
SEA5:00P
CHI
WAS5:00P
PHI
WSHSUN 8:20P
LIB
HPUSUN 11:59P
CHI
SEAMON 8:15P
VFB
GALTUE 12:45P
SCP
SHKTUE 12:45P
MUN
ATMTUE 3:00P
AVL
BARTUE 3:00P
LILL
BODOTUE 3:00P
INT
FEYTUE 3:00P
SLB
LASTUE 3:00P
ROMA
MANTUE 3:00P
PSG
VILTUE 3:00P
ATX1
LA4FT
RSL1
SJ2FT
NEV0
UCLA27FINAL
BUF3
LA2FINAL
OTT5
SJ1FINAL
FUL1AVL1FT
UTAH49
CIN25FINAL
UVA7
WAKE51FINAL
FLA8
UGA27FINAL
MINN16
IU23FINAL
ASU20
BYU27FINAL
NU26
ORE34FINAL
POR112
UTAH90FINAL
DAL1
SKC1FT
SD1
STL0FT
TB4
NSH5FINAL
EDM4
NYI0FINAL
DC0
CLB3FT
PHI0
CIN1FT
MTL1
NYC1FT
CRY0
TOT2FT
CHI4
BOS5FINAL
STL5
DET4FINAL
ORL0
CLT4FT
AUB15
MISS45FINALND35
NAVY13FINAL
ARIZ26
TTU34FINAL
SMU27
SYR30FINAL
WIS0
IOWA30FINAL
LEE0
BOU2FT
NFO0
BRE2FT
SUN1
COV3FT
IPS2
HUL2FT
BHA1
MNC0FTMAN0
CHE2FT
CAR19
GB27FINAL
MIL4
TB1FINALLoading…
We use a few first-party cookies to keep you signed in and remember your picks. We don’t use advertising or cross-site tracking cookies. Privacy Policy
Politics · Trending · 1 source
Who’s covering it
L 1 · C 0 · R 0Headline via The New York Times · First reported 5h ago · Updated 5h ago
The two jurisdictions contend that President Trump’s proposed 250-foot arch is “flagrantly unlawful,” citing concerns over traffic, the environment and historic preservation.
Read the full story at The New York Times
How does this story make you feel?
One tap every 30 seconds. Anonymous.
From TRD readers’ taps, not the media.
The New York Times · 3:11P ETLean Left
The two jurisdictions contend that President Trump’s proposed 250-foot arch is “flagrantly unlawful,” citing concerns over traffic, the environment and historic preservation.
By Luke Broadwater
We show headlines and short excerpts only. Read the full stories at each publisher.
Politics · Trending
PBS NewsHour · CBS News · The Guardian · 3h ago
Politics · Trending
PBS NewsHour · HuffPost · 5h ago
Politics · Trending
The Hill · 15m ago
Politics · Trending
ABC News · The Washington Times · 5h ago